What’s the significance of the Business Round Table?

Written by The Recap Team

2 min read

Milton Friedman always prioritized shareholders. But is this still the right way to operate? 

According to Friedman, the purpose of a corporation is to maximize returns to its shareholders. This means corporations have a responsibility to the public or society; their only responsibility is to its shareholders.

However, at the 2019 Business Roundtable,  181 CEOs of some of the world’s largest companies (CEOs from Amazon, Apple, Boeing, Chevron, Cisco, IBM, and Johnson & Johnson) are suggesting Friedman’s Shareholder Theory might be a  tad antiquated. To update it for the 21st Century, these business leaders are taking the initiative to redefine who their companies should be responsible for.

So What Are These CEOs Proposing?

The U.S. Business Roundtable (BRT) issued a statement redefining the purpose of a corporation. They say companies should be working for the benefit of its shareholders AND all of its other stakeholders (including but not limited to: customers, employees, suppliers, communities where they operate, etc.).

Signed by 181 CEOs (who make up or 95% of BRT members)  committing to:

  • Deliver value to their customers
  • Invest in their employees by providing fair compensation and benefits, investing in training and continuous learning, as well as foster diversity and inclusion
  • Deal fairly and ethically with their suppliers
  • Support the communities in which the companies operate by respecting the people as well as the environment by embracing sustainable business practices
  • Generate long-term value to its shareholders who provide capital, by committing to transparency and constant engagement.

One important caveat: It’s just the CEOs (not by the companies they represent) who committed to the ideas above.

While many applauded this move, not all the reactions were positive.

The Council of Institutional Investors (CII), a non-profit organization representing the U.S. pension and employee benefit funds with assets of more than $4 trillion, openly opposed the new articulation of the purpose of a corporation. CII is opposing the changes because they believe these changes may weaken shareholder rights “ it is critical to respect stakeholders, but also to have clear accountability to company owners.” CII also cited the absence of mechanisms in place to truly express and account for the company’s remaining stakeholders as the risk could be “accountability to everyone mean[ing] accountability to no one.”

While the Business Roundtable Pledge is just a start, it’s heartening to see the conversation is happening.  

The fact that the leaders of some of the largest companies in the world have come together and agreed to officially support a shift from shareholder primacy toward an explicit consideration of long-term stakeholder interests, is a significant accomplishment. 

We believe that it’s important to maintain the momentum that the statement has generated by rewarding companies that are ESG leaders in their industries. Is this enough? Or is it just the beginning? We’ll be keeping an eye on this to see where it goes. 

Ready to invest differently?

See what your impact portfolio could look like. No strings attached.

You May Also Like…

A Surge in Demand beyond Traditional ESG Funds

A Surge in Demand beyond Traditional ESG Funds

3 min read Background ESG incorporation is (1) applying a measure of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in investment analysis and portfolio selection and or (2) taking into consideration shareholders’ concerns over ESG issues during decision-making...

Welcome to Early Access!

Welcome to Early Access!

Our team has been dreaming, thinking, and working tirelessly on this product and we’re excited to share this with you. Read more about our the beginning of our CEO’s journey to use finance as a force for good.

The Power of Divestment

The Power of Divestment

Even before the modern era of ESG investing, the power of divestment was alive and well. Learn from one of our Fellows how protest divestment put direct pressure on the ruling National Party, and was pivotal in bringing about the end of apartheid and racial segregation in South Africa.

Recap is a sustainable investing platform that enables you to easily invest in companies that share the same environmental and social values as you.

Recap Investing Inc. is an SEC-registered investment adviser.

Brokerage services provided to clients of Recap Investing Inc. by Interactive Brokers LLC (https://www.interactivebrokers.com). Interactive Brokers is a member NYSE - FINRA - SIPC and regulated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Investments in securities: Not FDIC Insured • No Bank Guarantee • May Lose Value.
All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of money you invest, and past performance does not guarantee future performance. Historical returns, expected returns, and probability projections are provided for informational and illustrative purposes, and may not reflect actual future performance. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and Recap's fees and applicable custodial fees.

By using this website, you understand the information being presented is provided for informational purposes only and accept our Privacy Policy. Recap Investing relies on information from various sources believed to be reliable but cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of that information. Nothing on this website should be construed as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any security. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicative of future returns.

Recap's performance is hypothetical and does not represent the investment performance or the actual accounts of any clients. The securities in the hypothetical portfolio were selected with the full benefit of hindsight, after their performance over the period shown was known. The results achieved in our simulations do not guarantee future investment results. The model performance information is based on the back-tested performance of hypothetical investments over the time periods indicated. “Back-testing” is a process of objectively simulating historical investment returns by applying a set of rules for buying and selling securities, and other assets, backward in time, testing those rules, and hypothetically investing in the securities and other assets that are chosen. Any comparisons to indices are provided for illustrative purposes only.